Agent context packet

Structured metadata, source alternates, graph links, headings, series position, and diagram inventory for crawlers and agent readers.

Table of contents

  1. Quick Reference
  2. Which Safari Versions Produce t13d2014h2
  3. Why Safari’s Prefix Differs From Chrome
  4. Bot Detection Relevance
  5. Sources

Entry facts

Kind
snippet
Maturity
budding
Confidence
high
Origin
ai-drafted (AI-drafted, human-reviewed)
Author
Agent
Directed by
krow
Published
Words
526 (3 min read)
Tags
security, networking, fingerprinting, ja4, tls
Prerequisites
Full corpus
/llms-full.txt
Readable corpus
/source/full-corpus/

Graph links

Prerequisites bot-detection-2026

Related ja4-fingerprint-t13d1516h2ja4-decodercommon-ja4-fingerprints-decodedtls-impersonation-library-comparison

Tagssecurity, networking, fingerprinting, ja4, tls

Safari JA4 Fingerprint t13d2014h2 — TLS ClientHello

JA4 fingerprint t13d2014h2 is Safari's TLS 1.3 prefix: 20 cipher suites, 14 extensions, HTTP/2. Safari 18.4 and 26 produce t13d2014h2_a09f3c656075.

/ directed by / / 3 min read
On this page

t13d2014h2 is the JA4 TLS fingerprint prefix that modern Safari produces. It means the ClientHello used TLS 1.3, included SNI, had 20 cipher suites after JA4 deduplication and GREASE removal, had 14 extensions after JA4 deduplication and GREASE removal, and advertised HTTP/2 through ALPN. A full Safari JA4 looks like t13d2014h2_a09f3c656075_7f0f34a4126d.

Quick Reference

A JA4 fingerprint has three parts, a_b_c:

PartValueMeaning
at13d2014h2Human-readable shape of the TLS handshake (the prefix)
ba09f3c656075Truncated hash of the sorted cipher suites
c7f0f34a4126dTruncated hash of the sorted extensions plus signature algorithms

The t13d2014h2 prefix decodes further:

SegmentMeaning
t13TLS 1.3 ClientHello
dDomain/SNI is present
2020 cipher suites after JA4 deduplication and GREASE removal
1414 TLS extensions after JA4 deduplication and GREASE removal
h2HTTP/2 advertised through ALPN

Which Safari Versions Produce t13d2014h2

The t13d2014h2 prefix and the a09f3c656075 cipher hash stay stable across recent Safari releases; only the extension hash (part c) moves when Apple adjusts the extension or signature-algorithm list. These full strings are from live captures of curl_cffi Safari impersonation targets:

Safari profileFull JA4
Safari 18.4t13d2014h2_a09f3c656075_7f0f34a4126d
Safari 26.0t13d2014h2_a09f3c656075_d0a99439f9b1
Safari 26.0.1t13d2013h2_a09f3c656075_7f0f34a4126d

Note Safari 26.0.1: the prefix shifts to t13d2013h2 because the ClientHello carried one fewer extension after JA4 normalization (13 instead of 14). A single point release can change the prefix, so match on the full string when the version matters. To break down any JA4 string field by field, use the JA4 Fingerprint Decoder.

Why Safari’s Prefix Differs From Chrome

Chrome’s prefix is t13d1516h2 (15 ciphers, 16 extensions); Safari’s is t13d2014h2 (20 ciphers, 14 extensions). Safari offers the most cipher suites of the major browsers but the fewest extensions because Apple’s TLS stack builds a different ClientHello than Chrome’s BoringSSL. The counts alone narrow the browser family before any hash comparison: 20/14 is Safari-shaped, 15/16 is Chromium-shaped, and t13d1715h2 is Firefox. The prefix alone does not prove Safari, though — the full a_b_c string is needed for a stronger match, and a Chrome User-Agent paired with a t13d2014h2 prefix is an immediate inconsistency.

Bot Detection Relevance

Bot detection compares a claimed browser identity against the real network stack. Safari impersonation is harder than Chrome because Apple’s TLS library is not open source, so a client claiming to be Safari while producing a Chromium or Python prefix is flagged before any JavaScript challenge runs. For implementation context, TLS Impersonation Libraries Compared covers which libraries can replay a Safari fingerprint and where they break.

Sources

Diagram

Drag to pan · scroll or pinch to zoom · Esc to close